Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Asked: January 10, 20232023-01-10T07:13:23+00:00 2023-01-10T07:13:23+00:00

Date: 07/01/2023 Shift: 10:00 AM – 12:00 PM Q. No: 71

QnA Bot Enlightened

Q.71	With reference to the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (As amended), in which of the cases given below did the Supreme Court make the following observation? “The fact that details in the cheque have been filled up not by the drawer, but by some other person would be immaterial. The presumption which arises on the signing of the cheque cannot be rebutted merely on the report of a handwriting expert.”

Ans	1. Oriental Bank of Commerce vs. Prabodh Kumar Tiwari 2022 LiveLaw. Sc. 714
	2. K. Bhaskaran vs. Sankran Vidhyan Balan (1997) 7 SCC 5110
	3. Goa Plast Pvt. Ltd. vs. Chico Ursula D’Souza (2003) 3 SCC 232
	4. Sadanandan Bhadran vs. Mahadevan Sunil Kumar, AIR 1998 S.C. 3043

Correct Ans Provided: 1

Report

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,